"You can't avoid change no matter what. Situations only upgrade or downgrade."
- Amir Said

"You can't avoid change no matter what. Situations only upgrade or downgrade."
- Amir Said
Posted by Amir Said on April 30, 2008 in Culture & Philosophy | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
By Amir Said
After the last frame of this movie dissolved into the end credit sequence, my 11 year old son, Amir, turned to me and said: "Pop, that was four stars! How many do you give it?" My reply: "Hold on, we'll discuss it in the car..."
My son noticed that I was fixed on the elderly couple that had been sitting next to me, clearly enjoying this movie, (as I was). Back in our car on the drive home, I gave the simple part of my answer, "yes, it's a four star movie, no question," I said to my son, then I rolled out some of the immediate observations that I withdrew from “Reign”; each of which rendered an amazing impact on me.
As one of the earlier installments of what is sure to be later referred to as the 'Post 9/11 films', "Reign" delivers a refreshingly different look at a national mega tragedy. Rather than focus on the anger, rage, revenge, heroics, politics, and/or religious propaganda that 9/11 provoked, "Reign" focuses on the interlocking grip of friendship, love, unbearable pain, and irreversible hurt, that an event 9/11's magnitude could only expose.
Fact is, Binder targets the tragic loss, not the tragic event. And in doing so, he lends more meaning to an otherwise meaningless, unforgivable act. This in turn makes 9/11 hover and resonate, while we dual with the task of remembering what we do not want to remember.
"Reign" is about the tragedies that hit and miss us. The ones that are collective and the ones that are personal. The ones that strike like whiplash, and the ones that we ourselves seemingly lay down the foundations for. When tragedies hit, there are always multiple layers to navigate. But For Fineman (Adam Sandler) [Fine Man, aka: everyday, upstanding, family, regular man], perhaps there will never be any reckoning of the "collective tragedy". The base layer of his personal tragedy is so irregular, so unordinary, so abnormal that he's emotionally and physically "stuck", while the city and the small number of people who know him (the collective) have moved on from the base layer of their collective tragedy.
If this was the only point that "Reign" focused on it would still be a four-star film. But Binder goes further, he juxtaposes two tragedies. Fineman's major tragedy, the definite loss of his wife and life, leans heavy on Johnson (Don Cheadle). But this weight serves as the kind of wake up call that Johnson has been searching for. Indeed, because of his quest to help Fineman, he mentally commits to countering his own issues, namely his increasing detachment from his mundane life and the growing distance between he and his wife. Johnson escapes his own near tragedy, by helping Fineman work through his.
Regardless of the context, (here, in "Reign" it's the broad, very imposing tragedy of 9/11), the interlocking grip of friendship, love, unbearable pain, and irreversible hurt is an incredibly difficult force to decipher. But through an incredibly on-beat story, underscored with a chilling touch of humanity, "Reign" eloquently does just that.
Posted by Amir Said on April 27, 2008 in Film & Television | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Posted by Amir Said on April 26, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
By Amir Said
Before you maneuver, you have to think it, not dream it. In America, "dreams" are always lofty. There is no interpretation, or story-telling association with dreams. On the contrary, in America, dreams are held up as the cause and means of success. This is interesting because the American concept of dreams is in stark contrast with other cultures around the globe.
In other cultures, (read everywhere except here), dreams are associated with interpretation, story-telling, and the like. However, in America, the concept of dreams have been socialized to serve as a goal! That's right, a "goal", not a story, not an interpretation of an event or thought, but a goal. What's worse, the American dream/goal duality is never flushed out or broken down into the clear components that are associated with a goal. The notion of hard work, effective planning and preparation are never celebrated alongside the essence of the American Dream. Sure, in media snap-shot pieces, you may hear the run-down "rags-to-riches" story. But make no mistake: what's being sold is the mighty, shining dream realized, NOT, the daily grit and discipline of securing one goal after another.
By reshaping the concept of a dream, and fashioning it as a defacto meaning of a goal, many in America are taught to dream rather than do. Here, dreams are something that you have. Ironically, at the same time, it is considered to be something that one can achieve. But it is never itself considered to be a goal. So it stands that in America, there is a widespread premium on having a dream. And that my friends is where the problem lies.
Having a dream, a passive act indeed, feeds nothing to the hunger of a goal. A goal is something you think about, something you plan, something you do. Moreover, a goal consistently displays the fortunes and consequences of either achieving or failing to achieve it. Whereas a dream is a mirage, a sham palace of pseudo opportunity. This is the reason why loads of people allow themselves to be culled by a magnificent dream rather than think and do the necessary for reaching a recognizable goal.
Posted by Amir Said on April 26, 2008 in Articles, Culture & Philosophy | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
| Home 
Contact Us 
Advertise |
